Abstract
Kent çalışmaları ve teknoloji tarihi metinleriyle bilinen ve birçok farklı disiplinde çalışmalar yapmış olan Lewis Mumford’un teknoloji temelli iletişim çalışmalarına katkısı çok fazla değerlendirmeye alınan bir konu değildir. Özellikle medya ekolojisi geleneği çevre olarak medyanın incelenmesi yaklaşımıyla medya çalışmalarını ele alırken Mumford’un ekolojik temelli kent çalışmalarıyla anoloji kurulmasını sağlamıştır. Ortam olarak şehir ve ortam olarak medyayı incelemek benzer yaklaşımlar üretmiştir. Mumford’un teknoloji tarihi okuması ise Harold Innis ve Marshall McLuhan gibi isimlerin medya çalışmalarını etkilemiştir. Medya ekosistemindeki değişim ile insan zihnindeki değişim arasındaki paralelliğe uygun olarak bir teknoloji ve iletişim çağ dönemleri oluşturabilmelerine zemin hazırlamıştır. Bu çalışmada Lewis Mumford’un iletişim ve medya çalışmalarına yapmış olduğu katkılar, Mumford’un çalışmaları üzerinden ele alınacaktır.
References
- Anderson, C. W. (2013). Media ecosystems: Some notes toward a genealogy of the term and an application of it to journalism. Retrieved from C. W. Anderson Website: http://www.cwander son.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/EcosystemGenealogy.pdf
- Blake, C. (1991). Lewis Mumford (1895–1990). Technology and Culture, 32(1), 187–190.
- Cali, Dennis. (2017). Mapping Media Ecology, Peter Lang.
- Carey, J. W. (1979). The roots of modern media analysis: Lewis Mumford and Marshall McLuhan. Association for Education in Journalism, Houston, Texas.
- Ellul, J. (1964). The Technological Society. New York: Vintage Press.
- Geddes, P. (1904). City development: A study of parks, gardens and culture institutes: A report to the Carnegie Dunfermline Trust. Edinburgh, Scotland: Geddes and Colleagues.
- Giedion, S. (1948). Mechanization takes command. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Kuhns, W. (1971). The Post-Industrial Pprophets: Interpretations of Technology. New York, NY: Weybright & Talley.
- Levinson, P. (2000). McLuhan and Media Ecology. Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association 1, 17- 22.
- MacDougall, R. & Zhang, P. & Logan, R. (2013). Preface: Probing the Boundaries of Media Ecology. Explorations in Media Ecology, 12(3 and 4), (s.155–158).
- Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and Civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
- Mumford, L. (1952). Art and Technics. New York. NY: Colombia University Press.
- Mumford, L. (1961). The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
- Mumford, L. (1967). The Myth of the Machine: I. Technics and Human Development. NewYork: Harcourt, Brace and World.
- Mumford, L. (1970). The Myth of The Machine: II. The Pentagon of Power. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Munson, E. S. & Warren, C. A. (eds.). (1997). James Carey: A critical reader. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Nystrom, C. (1973). Towards a science of media ecology: Theformulation of integrated conceptualparadigms for the study of human communication systems. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. New York University.
- Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf. Postman, N. (1999). Building a Bridge to the Eighteenth Century: Ideas from The Past That Can Improve Our Future. New York: Knopf.
- Scolari, Carlos A. (2022). Evolution of The Media: Map of a Discipline Under Construction. A review. Profesional de la información, 31(2).
- Strate, L. & Lum, C. M. K. (2006). Lewis Mumford and the ecology of technics. In C. M. K. Lum (Ed.), Perspectives on culture, technology, and communication: The media ecology tradition (s. 71–95). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
- Strate, L. (2004). A media ecology review. Communication Research Trends, 23(2), (s.3–48).
- White, Lynn, Jr. (1962). Medieval Technology and Social Change. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Williams, R. (2002). Lewis Mumford’s technics and civilization. Technology and Culture, (1) (s.139–149).
Abstract
Lewis Mumford is a renowned scholar worked in various disciplines and chiefly known for his works in urban studies and technology history fields. Mumford’s contributions to technology-based communication studies is a disregarded/understudied subject. In particular, Mumford’s ecological-based urban studies have enabled the establishment of an analogy in the context of the dealing the media studies with the approach of examining the media as environment in the tradition of media ecology. Examining the city as a medium and the media as a medium has produced similar approaches. Mumford's study of the history of technology has influenced various media studies scholars such as Harold Innis and Marshall McLuhan. In accordance with the parallels between changes in the media ecosystem and the human mind, Mumford’s studies paved the way for them to create a technology and communication era. Through Lewis Mumford’s studies, this study discusses Lewis Mumford's contributions to communication and media studies.
References
- Anderson, C. W. (2013). Media ecosystems: Some notes toward a genealogy of the term and an application of it to journalism. Retrieved from C. W. Anderson Website: http://www.cwander son.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/EcosystemGenealogy.pdf
- Blake, C. (1991). Lewis Mumford (1895–1990). Technology and Culture, 32(1), 187–190.
- Cali, Dennis. (2017). Mapping Media Ecology, Peter Lang.
- Carey, J. W. (1979). The roots of modern media analysis: Lewis Mumford and Marshall McLuhan. Association for Education in Journalism, Houston, Texas.
- Ellul, J. (1964). The Technological Society. New York: Vintage Press.
- Geddes, P. (1904). City development: A study of parks, gardens and culture institutes: A report to the Carnegie Dunfermline Trust. Edinburgh, Scotland: Geddes and Colleagues.
- Giedion, S. (1948). Mechanization takes command. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Kuhns, W. (1971). The Post-Industrial Pprophets: Interpretations of Technology. New York, NY: Weybright & Talley.
- Levinson, P. (2000). McLuhan and Media Ecology. Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association 1, 17- 22.
- MacDougall, R. & Zhang, P. & Logan, R. (2013). Preface: Probing the Boundaries of Media Ecology. Explorations in Media Ecology, 12(3 and 4), (s.155–158).
- Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and Civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
- Mumford, L. (1952). Art and Technics. New York. NY: Colombia University Press.
- Mumford, L. (1961). The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
- Mumford, L. (1967). The Myth of the Machine: I. Technics and Human Development. NewYork: Harcourt, Brace and World.
- Mumford, L. (1970). The Myth of The Machine: II. The Pentagon of Power. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Munson, E. S. & Warren, C. A. (eds.). (1997). James Carey: A critical reader. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Nystrom, C. (1973). Towards a science of media ecology: Theformulation of integrated conceptualparadigms for the study of human communication systems. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. New York University.
- Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf. Postman, N. (1999). Building a Bridge to the Eighteenth Century: Ideas from The Past That Can Improve Our Future. New York: Knopf.
- Scolari, Carlos A. (2022). Evolution of The Media: Map of a Discipline Under Construction. A review. Profesional de la información, 31(2).
- Strate, L. & Lum, C. M. K. (2006). Lewis Mumford and the ecology of technics. In C. M. K. Lum (Ed.), Perspectives on culture, technology, and communication: The media ecology tradition (s. 71–95). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
- Strate, L. (2004). A media ecology review. Communication Research Trends, 23(2), (s.3–48).
- White, Lynn, Jr. (1962). Medieval Technology and Social Change. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Williams, R. (2002). Lewis Mumford’s technics and civilization. Technology and Culture, (1) (s.139–149).
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Communication and Media Studies |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Early Pub Date | June 23, 2023 |
| Publication Date | June 30, 2023 |
| Submission Date | May 9, 2023 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2023 |